Patna High Court
CR. APP (SJ)/2715/2026 of Rajesh Mahto @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2715 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2023 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1. Rajesh Mahto @ Rajesh Kumar S/O - Suresh Mahto R/O Vill.- Senuwariya,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2715 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2023 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT
District- West Champaran
======================================================
1.
Rajesh Mahto @ Rajesh Kumar S/O - Suresh Mahto R/O Vill.- Senuwariya, Tola- Behriwarwa, P.s.- Majhauliya, Dist.- West Champaran.
2.
Sanjay Mahto S/O Late Nagina Mahto R/O Vill.- Senuwariya, Tola- Behriwarwa, P.s.- Majhauliya, Dist.- West Champaran.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Ameirca Ram S/O late Anwat Ram R/O Vill.- Senuwariya, Tola- Behriwarwa, P.s.- Majhauliya, Dist.- West Champaran.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr. Rishabh Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Usha Kumari 1, Spl. PP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the Spl. PP, Ms. Usha Kumari 1 for the State.
2. The learned Spl. PP at the outset submits that there is a delay of 319 days in filing the appeal and from perusal of the grounds taken in the limitation application, it would manifest that the same is cryptic and does not inspire confidence, as it has been pleaded that appellant was not informed by his learned counsel about rejection of his anticipatory bail application by the learned District Court.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2715 of 2026(3) dt.18-08-2026
appellants is not in a position to rebut the said submission of the learned Spl. PP
4. Considering the submission made by the learned Spl. PP, the Court is not inclined to condone the delay in filing the appeal, as such, the limitation application as well as the appeal is dismissed.
krishna/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T