Patna High Court
MJC/801/2025 of Anant Mohan Thakur Vs The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate cum Collector Bhagalpur on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.801 of 2025 In FIRST APPEAL No.518 of 1984 ====================================================== Anant Mohan Thakur son of Late Sashi Mohan Thakur, Resident of Village/Mohalla-Mukhraj Rai Path, Near Ghuran Peer Baba, Chhoti
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.801 of 2025
In
FIRST APPEAL No.518 of 1984
======================================================
Anant Mohan Thakur son of Late Sashi Mohan Thakur, Resident of Village/Mohalla-Mukhraj Rai Path, Near Ghuran Peer Baba, Chhoti Khanjarpur, P.S.- Barari, District-Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate cum Collector Bhagalpur namely Sri Nawal Kishore Choudhary.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Additional Advocate General 3
Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3
Mr. Pawan Kumar Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
2 18-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 12.12.2025 passed in FA No. 518 of 1984.”
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be allowed to agitate the matter.
4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U