Patna High Court
CWJC/12614/2026 of Vijay Singh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12614 of 2026 ====================================================== Vijay Singh Yadav Son of Late Shivlagan Singh, Resident of Village Khaira, PS NTPC Khaira, District Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12614 of 2026
======================================================
Vijay Singh Yadav Son of Late Shivlagan Singh, Resident of Village Khaira, PS NTPC Khaira, District Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reform, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, Directorate of Land Acquisition, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate cum Collector, Aurangabad.
4.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Chief Executive Officer, Bhartiya Rail Baffle Campus Ltd. (A Joint Venture of India Railway and N.T.P.C.) its office located at the campus of BRBCHI Khaira, P.S.- N.T.P.C. Khaira Circle- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate
Vyas Kumar Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Government Pleader-16
For Respondent no.05
:
Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
Mr. Vaibhav Narayan, Advocate
Ms. Diksha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026 Heard Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for issuance of writ of mandamus commanding and directing to the concerned authority to refer the case before the Competent Court on the point of enhancement of compensation in the light of the order dated 12.07.2023 passed in CWJC No. 2743 of 2023 and several other cases that have been referred to the Competent Court on the Patna High Court CWJC No.12614 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026
ground of party and consistency.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that his case be also considered and disposed of in the light of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench in Kumar Ohm vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. (CWJC No. 2743 of 2023) dated 12.07.2023.
4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it.
5. The relevant portion of the aforesaid order passed in Kumar Ohm (supra) read as follows: “Considering the circumstances, the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad is directed to consider the case of petitioner under Section 64 of the RFCTLARRA, 2013 and shall pass order on merit and shall refer the matter for reference before LARRA, Gaya. With this observation and direction, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.”
6. In that background, the aforesaid writ petition is also disposed of in the same term.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U