Patna High Court
MJC/1003/2025 of Bhuneshwar Sah Vs Dr. B. Rajendra, the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1003 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19624 of 2024 ====================================================== Bhuneshwar Sah S/o- Gena Lal Sah, Resident of Village- Thumma, P.S.- Runni Saidpur, District- Sitamarhi, Bihar. ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1003 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19624 of 2024
======================================================
Bhuneshwar Sah S/o- Gena Lal Sah, Resident of Village- Thumma, P.S.- Runni Saidpur, District- Sitamarhi, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Dr. B. Rajendra, the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Bhagwat Ram, The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri Kishore Kumar, The Chief Engineer- 3, Rural Works Department, Govt.
of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Er. Deep Narayan Prasad, The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Circle, Sitamarhi.
5.
Avinash Kumar, The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Sitamarhi.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Government Pleader 13
Mr. Ravi Kumar, AC to GP-13
Mr. Akshay Lal Prasad, AC to GP-13
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 08.01.2025 passed in CWJC No. 19624 of 2024.”
3. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the Patna High Court MJC No.1003 of 2025(3) dt.18-08-2026
claim of the petitioner stands rejected.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to agitate the matter.
5. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U