Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57018/2026 of Ajay Prajapati Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57018 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2026 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ajay Prajapati S/o Babulal Prajapati Resident of 73 Gaon Khutikewal Khurd, P.S. - Hunterganj, Dist.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57018 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2026 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ======================================================
Ajay Prajapati S/o Babulal Prajapati Resident of 73 Gaon Khutikewal Khurd, P.S. - Hunterganj, Dist. - Chatra.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Praveen Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar- A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 179.7 litres of liquor from an auto.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, nor is not the owner of the seized auto and he came to be implicated based on suspicion that he is driver of the vehicle. It is further submitted that no owner of an auto keeps a driver for driving.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57018 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026
5. Learned A.P.P. Sri Rabindra Kumar opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sherghati P. S. Case No.39 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event, the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57018 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026
provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T