Patna High Court
CR. MISC./24406/2026 of Bablu Bind Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24406 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2023 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1. Bablu Bind S/O Late Jugdish Bind R/O Village- Shivnadan Pur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24406 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2023 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
1.
Bablu Bind S/O Late Jugdish Bind R/O Village- Shivnadan Pur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
2.
Sanju Devi W/O Bablu Bind R/O Village- Shivnadan Pur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
3.
Khushbu Kumari D/O Bablu Bind R/O Village- Shivnadan Pur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
4.
Pushpa Kumari D/O Bablu Bind R/O Village- Shivnadan Pur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
5.
Chanda Kumari D/O Bablu Bind R/O Village- Shivnadan Pur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.2, 3, 4 and 5 are women and the informant alleges that on 20.03.2023 at 9.30 A.M. he was going getting his wall plastered when six named accused persons including the petitioners came and Sanju Devi along with Dingra Kumar started abusing, on objection by his father, Sanju Devi, Khushbu and Pushpa assaulted his father by lathi, rod etc causing two injuries on head, while Dingra assaulted informant by rod causing injury on head and Bablu assaulted by lathi causing swelling on hand and accused also assaulted his wife and daughter, further injured were admitted in a hospital and informant was referred to Bhagalpur Mayaganj Hospital.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to property. It is further submitted that petitioners and the informant are agnates and from side of the petitioners, Sultanganj P.S. Case No.161 of 2023 was instituted against the informant and his side. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that women members of the family have been implicated only with an intent to coerce the male members into submission. It is next submitted that as far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, he is alleged to have assaulted the informant by lathi causing swelling on hand, while Dingra is alleged to have assaulted the informant by rod causing injury on head. It is further submitted that the order impugned records the injury of the informant (Sunil Bind) and from perusal of the same, it would manifest that informant suffered lacerated wound of size approximately 6x1x1 on parietal region of head but then the assault is alleged to have been made by Dingra Kumar and as far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, he is alleged to have assaulted the informant by lathi causing swelling on hand which is non-vital part of the body. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals and if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove their innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the fact that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and assault made by petitioner no.1 is on non-vital part of the body and petitioner no.2 to 5 are women, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No.160 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T