Patna High Court

CWJC/6884/2024 of Tarik Anwar Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6884 of 2024 ====================================================== Tarik Anwar S/o Md. Musa Sidiki Resident of Mohalla- Auraiya, Ward No. 10, Adapur, Auraia, P.S.- Adapur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6884 of 2024

======================================================

Tarik Anwar S/o Md. Musa Sidiki Resident of Mohalla- Auraiya, Ward No.

10, Adapur, Auraia, P.S.- Adapur, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Secondary Education Department (Minority), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Secondary Education (Minority), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari.

4.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment0, East Champaran at Motihari.

5.

The District Education Officer, East Champaran at Motihari, Bihar.

6.

The Block Education Officer, Adapur, East Champaran, Bihar.

7.

The Chairman, Managing Committee, Madarsa, Islamiya, Adapur, East Champaran, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Standing Counsel (15)

For the Madarsa Board

:

Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, Adv.

Md. Aslam Ansari, Adv.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

4 18-08-2026 Heard the parties.

2. After some arguments, learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail remedies available under the law.

3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands closed with the aforesaid liberty.

rohit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead