Patna High Court
CR. MISC./51344/2025 of Abhimanyu Kumar @ Mantu Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51344 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2165 Year-2019 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Abhimanyu Kumar @ Mantu S/o Nandkishor Prasad @ Badri Bhagat Resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51344 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2165 Year-2019 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT
District- East Champaran
======================================================
Abhimanyu Kumar @ Mantu S/o Nandkishor Prasad @ Badri Bhagat Resident of village- Dilawarpur Tola Alkhadwari, P.S.- Keshariya, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Neha Kumari D/o Kameshwar Prasad R/o vill - Partapur, P.S.- Mehsi, Distt.- East Champaran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP
Mr.V.S.Srivastava, Adv.for OP-2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 4
18-08-2026 Pursuant to order of this Court, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court, but the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the complainant / opposite party no. 2.
3. The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offences under Sections 498(A), 323, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51344 of 2025(6) dt.18-08-2026
Page 2 of 4
4. Petitioner is alleged to have committed torture and harassment with opposite party no. 2 for dowry.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner denies the allegation made in the complaint petition and submits that he never committed torture to opposite party no. 2 or demanded any dowry. However, the petitioner undertakes to give Rs. 3,000/- per month by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month, to the opposite party no.2.
6. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give temporary relief/solace of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) per month to the opposite party no. 2, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of concerned Court at East Champaran where the case is pending in connection with Trial No. 2311 of 2025, arising out of Complaint Case No. C-2165 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. as well as on the following conditions:- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51344 of 2025(6) dt.18-08-2026
Page 3 of 4
“(1) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.
(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid amount per month in the savings bank account of the opposite party no. 2.
(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the aforesaid amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.
(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.”
anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T
Page 4 of 4
Loading citations and judicial treatment…