Patna High Court
MJC/2274/2017 of Bijendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Government Of Bihar, Patna on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2274 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6075 of 2017 ====================================================== Bijendra Kumar, S/o Late Ram Lakshan Rai, R/o Trimurti Nagar, Sultanpur, P.S. Danapur, District-Patna ... ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2274 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6075 of 2017
======================================================
Bijendra Kumar, S/o Late Ram Lakshan Rai, R/o Trimurti Nagar, Sultanpur, P.S. Danapur, District-Patna
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. Durgesh Nandan, The Secretary, State Election Commission, Bihar
3. Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, The District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer (Nagarpalika), Patna.
4. Sushil Kumar, Block Development Officer cum Revising Authority, Danapur, Patna
5. Sanjeev Kumar, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Danapur, Patna
... ... Opposite Parties
Appearance :
For the Petitioner
:
Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, Advocate
M/s Anamika Anshu, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, AAG- 7
For the O.P. No.2
:
Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
3 18-08-2026 Learned counsel for the Petitioner is submitting that the writ order has been complied with. Hence, nothing survives in this contempt petition.
2. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Chandan/- (Jitendra Kumar, J.) U