Patna High Court

CR. APP (SJ)/373/2026 of Jawahar Sah Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.373 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2024 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1. Jawahar Sah S/o- Late Munni Lal Sah Village- Bachharpur PS- Pupri District- Sitamarhi 2. Dinesh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.373 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2024 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ======================================================

1.

Jawahar Sah S/o- Late Munni Lal Sah Village- Bachharpur PS- Pupri District- Sitamarhi

2.

Dinesh Sah S/o- Jawahar Sah Village- Bachharpur PS- Pupri District- Sitamarhi

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Pramila Devi Satilal Paswan R/V- Bachharpur, P.S.-Pupri, Dist- Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Appellant/s

:

Mr. Ravi Ranjan

For the State

:

Mr. Binay Krishna- Spl.P.P.

For the Informant

:

Mr. Devendra Kumar

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

18-08-2026

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The appellants have challenged the order dated 21.05.2025 passed by the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-1-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Sitamarhi in connection with ABP No.26 of 2025 arising out of Pupri P. S. Case No.436 of 2024, instituted for the offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 76 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby their prayer for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.373 of 2026(4) dt.18-08-2026

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, at the outset, submits that he has instruction of the informant not to oppose the appeal as the parties have compromised the case and an application has been filed before the learned Trial Court as the dispute is primarily civil in nature.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, the order dated 21.05.2025 is set-aside.

5. The appeal stands allowed.

6. The appellants, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of eight weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-1- cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Sitamarhi in connection with ABP No.26 of 2025 arising out of Pupri P. S. Case No.436 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead