Patna High Court
MJC/2005/2025 of Amit Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2005 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.899 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Amit Kumar, S/O Sidhnath Prasad, resident of -Saguna, P. S. -Danapur, District- Patna. 2. Nand Jee Singh, S/O
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2005 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.899 of 2024
======================================================
1.
Amit Kumar, S/O Sidhnath Prasad, resident of-Saguna, P. S. -Danapur, District- Patna.
2.
Nand Jee Singh, S/O Radha mohan Singh, R/o Sohnipatti, P.S- Buxar Town, District-Buxar.
3.
Manoj Kumar Singh, S/O Kashinath Singh, R/O Mishrawallya, Ashok Nagar, P.S Buxar (M), District- Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New, Secretariat, Patna.
2.
Sri S. Siddharth, I.A.S, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
3.
Sri Yogendra Singh, I.A.S., The Director Secondary Education cum Chief Executive Officer, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination and Examination Board. New Secretariat, Patna.
4.
Sri Pankaj Kumar, The Director Primary Education, Govt of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
5.
Sri Anand Kishor, I.A.S, The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Budh Marg, Patna.
6.
Sri Pramod Kumar, The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Budh Marg, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Standing Counsel 11
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their Patna High Court MJC No.2005 of 2025(3) dt.18-08-2026
willful disobedience of the order dated 12.02.2025 passed in CWJC No. 899 of 2024.”
3. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the order stands complied.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that liberty may be granted to agitate the matter.
5. Granting liberty to the petitioners to agitate the matter, if grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U