Patna High Court
CWJC/4849/2024 of Bhaidhnath Sah Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4849 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Bhaidhnath Sah Son of Late Saryug Sah, resident of village - Chakka, P.S. - Baheri, District - Darbhanga. 2. Jagarnath Sah, Son of Late Saryug Sah, resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4849 of 2024
======================================================
1.
Bhaidhnath Sah Son of Late Saryug Sah, resident of village - Chakka, P.S. - Baheri, District - Darbhanga.
2.
Jagarnath Sah, Son of Late Saryug Sah, resident of village - Chakka, P.S. - Baheri, District - Darbhanga.
3.
Shivnath Sah, Son of Late Saryug Sah, resident of village - Chakka, P.S. - Baheri, District - Darbhanga.
4.
Raghunath Sah, Son of Late Saryug Sah, resident of village - Chakka, P.S. - Baheri, District - Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Department Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Department Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Darbhanga.
4.
The Land Reform Deputy, Darbhanga.
5.
The Circle Officer, Baheri, District - Darbhanga.
6.
The Station House Officer Baheri P.S., District - Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Additional Advocate General (13)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners agrees that the appeal is pending before the ‘authority concerned’ and seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
4. As such, the present writ petition stands disposed Patna High Court CWJC No.4849 of 2024(6) dt.18-08-2026
of, with the aforesaid liberty.
5. It is expected that the ‘Authority concerned’ will look into the redressal of grievance of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of filing of the certified copy of this order.
Bipin/- (Alok Kumar, J) U