Patna High Court
CR. MISC./47849/2026 of Vilas Paswan Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47849 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2026 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Vilas Paswan Son of Late Shambhu Paswan Resident of Village -Naraha, Dhab Tola ward no. 10, PS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47849 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2026 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ======================================================
Vilas Paswan Son of Late Shambhu Paswan Resident of Village -Naraha, Dhab Tola ward no. 10, PS -Suppi Distt- Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
XXX Wife of YYY Resident of Village -Naraha, Dhab Tola ward no. 10, PS
-Suppi Distt- Sitamarhi
... ... Opposite Parties
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh, Advocate
For Informant
:
Mr. Rohit Ranjan, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 70 of 2026, instituted for the offences under Sections 70(i) and 78 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67 of the I.T. Act.
3. The Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner, kidnapped the daughter-in-law of the informant and committed rape against her and they also made video.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47849 of 2026(3) dt.18-08-2026
crime. He further submits that no video has been made in respect to the alleged crime. The counsel lastly submits that petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2026 and he has clean criminal antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant, vehemently, opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the informant further submits that due to victim mental state, the petitioner and other co-accused persons committed rape against her. He further submits that in the statement of the victim recorded u/s 180 and 183 of the BNSS, she has made specific allegations against the petitioner.
6. Having heard the parties. Taking into account the statement of victim recorded u/s 180 and 183 of the BNSS, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
9. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew the prayer for grant of bail before the Trial Court, if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months from today. If any such application is filed before the learned court below, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47849 of 2026(3) dt.18-08-2026
the court concerned shall consider the same on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.
manish/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T