Patna High Court

MJC/4533/2018 of Neelam Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4533 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.902 of 2008 ====================================================== Neelam Kumari W/o Sri Arun Rajak R/o Village- Goh, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4533 of 2018

In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.902 of 2008

======================================================

Neelam Kumari W/o Sri Arun Rajak R/o Village- Goh, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar

2.

Mr. Kapildeo Kamat, the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Kundan Kumar, The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

4.

Mr. Praveen Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Goh, Aurangabad.

5.

Mr. Kamlesh Singh, J.P.S. Goh, Aurangabad.

6.

Smt. Shobha Devi, Sarpanch, Goh Panchayat, District- Aurangabad.

7.

Nirmala Singh W/o Sri Mritunjay Kumar Singh R/O Village- Saharsa, P.S.- Uphara, District- Aurangabad.

8.

Sita Devi W/o Sri Indradeo Prasad R/O Village- Achuli, P.S.- Pouthu, District- Aurangabad.

9.

Kumari Poonam W/o Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh R/O Village- Gamhariya, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad.

10.

Ashutosh Kumar Pandey S/o Sri Ashok Pandey R/O Village- Egnail, P.S.

Jamhore, District- Aurangabad.

11.

Devendra Kumar Trivedi S/o Sri Gabhubir Trivedi R/O Village- Pouthu, P.S.- Jamhore, District- Aurangabad.

12.

Manju Kumari D/o Sri Birbal Yadav R/O Village- Ramdih, P.S. Goh, District Aurangabad.

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

None

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Incharge, AAG-5

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

18-08-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned Counsel for the State is present.

2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the Patna High Court MJC No.4533 of 2018(5) dt.18-08-2026

Order under contempt is of the year 2009 and the instant contempt petition has been filed in the year 2018, whereas period for filing contempt is one year only.

3. Presently, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner either to seek adjournment or to defend her case.

4. Hence, this Court has no option but to dismiss this case due to non-prosecution. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Mkr/anjali/- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead