Patna High Court
CR. MISC./21252/2026 of Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21252 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- MANPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Deepak Kumar S/o Sri Hariraj Yadav Resident of village- Damrapur, P.S.- Manpur, Distt- West
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21252 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- MANPUR District- West Champaran ======================================================
Deepak Kumar S/o Sri Hariraj Yadav Resident of village- Damrapur, P.S.- Manpur, Distt- West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
X D/o Y R/o Vill- Damrapur, P.s.- Manpur, Distt- West Champaran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sharad Kumar Verma
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nagendra Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 76, 78 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that she is a minor aged about 14 years and the petitioner along with Ravi harass her and on 8.2.2026 at 11 pm while she was returning from a marriage, when petitioner along with Ravi intercepted her and tried to forcefully made her sit on the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21252 of 2026(4) dt.17-08-2026
motorcycle but she somehow managed to escape and came back home and her mother also witnessed the accused persons fleeing from the place of occurrence.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that it does not appear probable that the victim in the night at 11 pm would have been returning back home all alone. It is further submitted that victim in her statement recorded under section 183 BNSS has supported the case of the prosecution and has also disclosed that petitioner in relation is nephew of the informant and is married, but then in the FIR the informant does not disclose the said fact which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution that for ulterior reason the FIR was instituted.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that informant is a minor and she alleges that petitioner along with Ravi used to harass her and on the date of occurrence also they tired to made her sit on the motorcycle forcefully. It is further submitted after perusing the case diary that process under section 82 Cr.P.C has been issued and executed against the petitioner.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21252 of 2026(4) dt.17-08-2026
and taking into consideration the fact that process under Section 82 Cr.P.C has been issued and executed against the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T