Patna High Court
CWJC/12418/2026 of Baladev Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12418 of 2026 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.377 of 2026 ====================================================== Baladev Yadav Son of Late Bhadhya Yadav, Resident of village- Murli, Ward No.03, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12418 of 2026
In
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.377 of 2026
======================================================
Baladev Yadav Son of Late Bhadhya Yadav, Resident of village- Murli, Ward No.03, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Information Technology Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate, Supaul.
3.
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Supaul.
4.
The Circle Officer, Saraigardh Bhaptiyahi, Supaul.
5.
The Circle Chief Executive Officer (CCEO) of Indus Towers Ltd. Alankar Business Centre, East Boarding Canal Road, Buddha Colony, Patna-800001
and registered office Building No.10, Tower-A 4th floor, DLF Cyber City, Gurugram-122002, Haryana.
6.
Parmeshwar Yadav Son of Late Bachcha Yadav, Resident of village and P.O.- Murli, P.S.-Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul, pin-852105.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Amar Nath Yadav, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Government Pleader (16)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard Mr. Amar Nath Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus in order to direct the concerned respondent authority specially the respondent no. 5 to remove the illegally installed/erected Mobile tower from the plot no. 999, which belongs to the petitioner.
(ii) for issuance of a writ in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.12418 of 2026(3) dt.17-08-2026
nature of mandamus for directing specially the respondent no. 5 for forbidding/ restraining the illegally installing/erecting work of Mobile tower over the petitioner's plot of land which had been purchased by him (the petitioner) in the year 1955.
(iii) for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, commanding the respondent authority to preclude himself from erecting the Mobile tower over the petitioner's plot of land and further directing him to remove the incomplete installed tower from his plot of land i.e. from plot no. 999.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be knocking the doors of the competent civil court for the redressal of the grievances.
4. Granting said liberty, CWJC No. 12418 of 2026 stands disposed of.
ankita/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U