Patna High Court
MJC/3093/2025 of Ritu Gupta @ Ginni Vs Abhijeet Kumar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3093 of 2025 ====================================================== Ritu Gupta @ Ginni W/o Abhijeet Kumar, D/o Shri Baidyanath Prasad Gupta R/o- Mohalla N.C. Chatterjee Lane, Sai Janki Enclave, Flat No. G - 5, Mundichak, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3093 of 2025
======================================================
Ritu Gupta @ Ginni W/o Abhijeet Kumar, D/o Shri Baidyanath Prasad Gupta R/o- Mohalla N.C. Chatterjee Lane, Sai Janki Enclave, Flat No. G - 5, Mundichak, P.S.- Tilkamanjhi, District Bhagalpur, Currently R/o- Mohalla- Brahman Toli, Purani Bazar Makhan Sah Chowk, P.S.- Town Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Abhijeet Kumar S/o Shri Pashupati Prasad Sah R/o- Mohalla N.C. Chatterjee Lane, Sai Janki Enclave, Flat No. G - 5, Mundichak, P.S.- Tilkamanjhi, District Bhagalpur.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Pragya Kiran Kumari, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard Mr. Patanjali Rishi, learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing and Ms. Pragya Kiran for the opposite.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): "for transfer of Matrimonial Case No. 85 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur.”
3. The opposite party on the other hand submits that he has no objection to the relief sought for by the petitioner but Patna High Court MJC No.3093 of 2025(3) dt.17-08-2026
he be allowed to appear through the video conferencing.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the opposite party appear through the video conferencing.
5. Having heard with the consent of both parties, Matrimonial Case No. 85 of 2025 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing.
6. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.
7. The MJC No. 3093 of 2025 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.
Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U