Patna High Court
MJC/131/2025 of Raju Kumar Vs Rani Kumari on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.131 of 2025 ====================================================== Raju Kumar Son of Shri Durga Prasad, Resident of Mohalla R.K. College Gate, Ward No. 04, P.O. Madhubani, P.S. and District- Madhubani Pin- 847211. ... ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.131 of 2025
======================================================
Raju Kumar Son of Shri Durga Prasad, Resident of Mohalla R.K. College Gate, Ward No. 04, P.O. Madhubani, P.S. and District- Madhubani Pin-
847211.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Rani Kumari D/O Shri Jagdeo Gupta, Resident of Mohalla- Heeralal Chouk, Kaseri Gali, Main Road, Begusarai, P.S.- Nagar, P.O. and District- Begusarai.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Ratanakar Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect(s) pointed out by the office.
2. Heard Mr. Ratnakar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “for transfer of Divorce Case No. 163 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhubani”.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is a handicapped and as such is unable to go to Begusarai.
Patna High Court MJC No.131 of 2025(4) dt.17-08-2026
However, if he is allowed to appear through video conferencing, the petitioner may not have any problem.
5. In this case, notice was issued but despite valid service of notice, there is no appearance.
6. This Court is of the opinion that if he is handicapped, can very well appear either physically or through the video conferencing.
7. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.
8. With the aforesaid observation, the present petition is disposed of.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U