Patna High Court
MJC/3537/2025 of Suman Kumari Megotia Vs Amit Kumar Agarwal on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3537 of 2025 ====================================================== Suman Kumari Megotia Wife of Amit Kumar Agarwal, D/o Sanjay Kumar Megotia resident of Village Marwadi Mohalla Begusarai, Ward No. 22, near Sultania Vivah Bhawan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3537 of 2025
======================================================
Suman Kumari Megotia Wife of Amit Kumar Agarwal, D/o Sanjay Kumar Megotia resident of Village Marwadi Mohalla Begusarai, Ward No. 22, near Sultania Vivah Bhawan P.S. Town District- Begusarai - 851101.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Amit Kumar Agarwal S/o Late Shyam Sunder Agarwal, R/o of village G.T.
Road Mohania, Ward No. 16, House No. 200, P.S. Mohania, District Kaimur-
821109.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Braj Bhushan Poddar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Gyaneshwar Shandilya, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred: “for the transfer of Matrimonial (divorce) Case No. 150 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaimur at Bhabhua to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court Begusarai.”
3. The lady has shown her inability to attend in proceeding and reasons also recorded in paragraphs.
4. Learned counsel representing the opposite party also says that he has difficulty and there is apprehension in appearing before the transferred place but if he is allowed to appear through the video conferencing, has no objection.
5. The petitioner has no objection to the husband Patna High Court MJC No.3537 of 2025(5) dt.17-08-2026
appearing through video conferencing.
6. In that background, with the consent of both the parties, Matrimonial (divorce) Case No. 462 of 2025 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaimur at Bhabhua to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing.
7. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.
8. The MJC No. 3537 of 2025 stands disposed of.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U