Patna High Court
MJC/3055/2025 of Neha Kumari @ Neha Singh Vs Praveen Kumar Singh @ Praveen Singh on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3055 of 2025 ====================================================== Neha Kumari @ Neha Singh wife of Praveen Kumar Singh and daughter of Arun Kumar Singh, resident of village- Udwant Nagar, P.S.- Udwant Nagar, District- Bhojpur.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3055 of 2025
======================================================
Neha Kumari @ Neha Singh wife of Praveen Kumar Singh and daughter of Arun Kumar Singh, resident of village- Udwant Nagar, P.S.- Udwant Nagar, District- Bhojpur. Ara.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Praveen Kumar Singh @ Praveen Singh son of Janardan Pratap Singh, resident of Village- Janakpuriya. P.S.- Chouri. District-Bhojpur, present address ward no. 7, Brahm Asthan. Veer Kunwar Singh Colony, Hajipur, P.O.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ram Kishore Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashutosh Krishna, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): "for transfer of Divorce Case No. 288 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hajipur to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ara.”
3. The opposite party on the other hand submits that he has no objection to the relief sought for by the petitioner but he be allowed to appear through the video conferencing.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the opposite party appear through the video conferencing.
Patna High Court MJC No.3055 of 2025(4) dt.17-08-2026
5. Having heard with the consent of both parties, Divorce Case No. 288 of 2022 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hajipur to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ara with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing.
6. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ara considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.
7. The MJC No. 3055 of 2025 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.
Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U