Patna High Court

MJC/1001/2025 of Nitish Kumar Thakur @ Nitish Kumar Vs Sanjana Kumari on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1001 of 2025 ====================================================== Nitish Kumar Thakur @ Nitish Kumar Son of Ram Chandra Thakur, Resident of Mohalla- Thakur Niwas, Gokul Nagar, Laskaripur, P.S. Kanti District Muzaffarpur, Permanent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1001 of 2025

======================================================

Nitish Kumar Thakur @ Nitish Kumar Son of Ram Chandra Thakur, Resident of Mohalla- Thakur Niwas, Gokul Nagar, Laskaripur, P.S. Kanti District Muzaffarpur, Permanent Address- Village- Wishoul, P.S. Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Sanjana Kumari Wife of Nitish Kumar Thakur and Daughter of Ram Kumar Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Naya Gaon Tola Satkhuti, P.O. Nayagaon, P.S.

Parbatta, District- Khagaria.

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Ms.Khushi Awadh, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

17-08-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect(s) pointed out by the office.

2. Heard the parties.

3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “for transfer of Maintenance Case No. 21 of 2023 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Khagaria to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur”.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has to look after his ailing parents and as such is unable to go to Patna High Court MJC No.1001 of 2025(2) dt.17-08-2026

Khagaria. However, if he is allowed to appear through video conferencing, the petitioner may not have any problem.

5. This Court is of the opinion that if he is unable to contest the case in Khagaria, can very well appear either physically or through the video conferencing.

7. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Khagaria considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.

8. With the aforesaid observation, the present petition is disposed of.

Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead