Patna High Court
MJC/237/2025 of Neha Pathak Vs Mr. Utpal Mishra on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.237 of 2025 ====================================================== Neha Pathak W/o Utpal Mishra, Resident of Fazilabad, P.O. Gopalpur, P.S. Gopalpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus Mr. Utpal Mishra S/o Sri Gopal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.237 of 2025
======================================================
Neha Pathak W/o Utpal Mishra, Resident of Fazilabad, P.O. Gopalpur, P.S.
Gopalpur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Mr. Utpal Mishra S/o Sri Gopal Mishra, R/o Village- Machhali Fatak, P.S.
Gayatri Mandir, District Gaya, Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Kaustubh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred: “for the transfer of Matrimonial Divorce Case vide M.T.S. No. 66 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gaya to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court Patna.”
3. The lady has shown her inability to attend the proceedings at the present place and reasons also assigned.
4. Learned counsel representing the opposite party also says that he has difficulty and there is apprehension in appearing before the transferred place but if he is allowed to appear through the video conferencing, has no objection.
5. The petitioner has no objection to the husband Patna High Court MJC No.237 of 2025(4) dt.17-08-2026
appearing through video conferencing.
6. In that background, with the consent of both the parties, Matrimonial Divorce Case vide M.T.S. No. 66 of 2021 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gaya to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing.
7. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.
8. The MJC No. 237 of 2025 stands disposed of.
9. This Court would request the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna to see to it that unnecessary adjournments are not made in the matter and it is taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U