Patna High Court
MJC/3574/2025 of Niki Kumari Vs Deepak Kumar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3574 of 2025 ====================================================== Niki Kumari Wife of Deepak Kumar, R/o Village- Jamuwan, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur at Presently Resided, D/o Shree Lal Sharma @ Ram Nivash Sharma, R/o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3574 of 2025
======================================================
Niki Kumari Wife of Deepak Kumar, R/o Village- Jamuwan, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur at Presently Resided, D/o Shree Lal Sharma @ Ram Nivash Sharma, R/o Village- Gainari, P.S.- Kinjar, District- Arwal.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Deepak Kumar Son of Gupteshwar Chaudhary, R/o Village- Gamuwan, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sunny Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Saurav Kr. Pandey, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred: “for the transfer of Matrimonial Case No. 481 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jehanabad.”
3. The lady has shown her inability in different paragraphs.
4. Learned counsel representing the opposite party also says that he has difficulty and there is apprehension in appearing before the transferred place but if he is allowed to appear through the video conferencing, has no objection.
5. The petitioner has no objection to the husband Patna High Court MJC No.3574 of 2025(5) dt.17-08-2026
appearing through video conferencing.
6. In that background, with the consent of both the parties, Matrimonial Case No. 481 of 2024 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jehanabad with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing.
7. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jehanabad considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.
8. The MJC No. 3574 of 2025 stands disposed of.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U