Patna High Court
CR. MISC./24353/2026 of Vijay Sah @ Vijayee Sah Vs The State of Bihar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24353 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-413 Year-2022 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Vijay Sah @ Vijayee Sah S/O Late Khodas Sah Resident of Vill- Churaman Patti, Ward No-01,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24353 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-413 Year-2022 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ======================================================
Vijay Sah @ Vijayee Sah S/O Late Khodas Sah Resident of Vill- Churaman Patti, Ward No-01, P.S.-Nautan, Dist- West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Gaya Prasad S/O Late Bipal Prasad R/O Village- Baikunthwa, Ward No.15, P.S- Nautan, Distt.- West Champaran.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sitesh Kashyap
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The petitioner is said to have prepared a forged document on stamp paper stating that he has given Rs. 25,000/- as advance money to the informant in respect of two pieces of land.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case essentially involves a civil dispute between the parties and after investigation, the police even submitted final Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24353 of 2026(6) dt.17-08-2026
form stating the occurrence to be arising out of a land dispute between the parties (Annexure-P/2). However, differing with the final form, cognizance was taken as against the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case and in the cross case also the police has also submitted the final form.
5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 have opposed the application for anticipatory bail on the basis of the allegations and also that there are criminal antecedents. However, in response to which, it has been submitted that the petitioner is on bail in all the cases.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the facts that there is case and counter case and cognizance has been taken differing with the final form, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 413 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. subject to the further conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24353 of 2026(6) dt.17-08-2026
(i) One of the bailors will be a family member/close relative.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation/trial.
devendra/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T