Patna High Court
CR. MISC./53679/2026 of Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53679 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Son of Chhatu Paswan @ Nand Kishor Paswan Resident of Village Bhurkunda, P.S.- Goh,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53679 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ======================================================
Chandan Kumar Son of Chhatu Paswan @ Nand Kishor Paswan Resident of Village Bhurkunda, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 189(6), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 324(4), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases, it is further submitted that informant alleges that 22 named accused persons including the petitioner along with 20-25 unknown accused surrounded the house of the informant and threatened with dire consequences for not paying the amount of extortion of Rs. 5 lakhs, further the informant concealed himself in the house and the accused persons damaged the vehicles of the informant kept Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53679 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026
outside, it is further alleged that Ravindra, Devrul, Kavindra, Nagendra and Fulendra had been regularly threatening the informant for paying extortion money.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Birendra Paswan had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cri Misc No. 81554 of 2025 and the same came to be allowed by a learned Co-Ordinate Bench by an order dated 10.12.2025, it is further submitted that case of the petitioner is similar to the case of Birendra Paswan thus based on parity seeks anticipatory bail, it is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the investigation to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53679 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026
with Goh P.S. Case No. 153 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
7. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father Chhatu Paswan @ Nand Kishor Paswan.
8. However, it is made clear that, in that event, if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not co-operating in the investigation, in that event, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
9. Thus, this application stands allowed.
Nitesh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T