Patna High Court
MJC/1915/2026 of Shreyash Bhardwaj Vs The Union of India through Principal Secretory, Department of Home Government of India, New Delhi on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1915 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5074 of 2026 ====================================================== Shreyash Bhardwaj, S/o Sri Naresh Kumar, R/o Village Chhajan Sangram, PO Chhajan Harishankar, PS Turki, District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1915 of 2026
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5074 of 2026
======================================================
Shreyash Bhardwaj, S/o Sri Naresh Kumar, R/o Village Chhajan Sangram, PO
Chhajan Harishankar, PS Turki, District Muzaffarpur, At Present R/o Mohalla Aadarsh Nagar, Majhaulia, PO Khabra (Now Dumari), PS Sadar, District Muzaffarpur, Pincode 843113, Mob No 9430010000.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through Principal Secretory, Department of Home Government of India, New Delhi New Delhi. Govind Mohan.
2.
State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna, Pratyaya Amrit.
3.
Principal Secretary, Department of Home Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar Kundan Kumar.
4.
District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. Kumar Gaurav.
5.
District Arms Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. Archana Kumari.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Standing Counsel 18
Mr. AC to SC-18
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to SC-18 for the State.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the instant contempt application has been filed for initiating a proceeding of contempt against the contemnor opposite party nos. 4 and 5 for their willful disobedience of the order dated 12.05.2026 in CWJC No.5074 of 2026.
3. At this stage, the learned AC to SC-18 submits that Patna High Court MJC No.1915 of 2026(3) dt.17-08-2026
a show-cause on behalf of opposite party nos.4 and 5 has been filed and from perusal of the Annexure-R/B to the show-cause, it would manifest that the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur has passed a reasoned order dated 07.08.2026, whereby the claim of the petitioner for possessing third firearm has been rejected, on which the petitioner in person submits that no doubt, order dated 07.08.2026 has been passed by the Collector, Muzaffarpur rejecting his claim, but then the case has not been adjudicated in its correct perspective, but then seeks permission to withdraw the contempt application with liberty to assail the order dated 07.08.2026 passed by the Collector, Muzaffarpur in compliance of the order dated 12.05.2026 in CWJC No.5074 of 2026.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the contempt application is disposed off with the liberty aforesaid.
vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U