Patna High Court
CR. MISC./53719/2026 of Babita Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53719 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2026 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1. Babita Devi W/o Umesh Ram Resident of Village- Jamo Mathiya, PS- Jamo Bazar, District- Siwan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53719 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2026 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan ======================================================
1.
Babita Devi W/o Umesh Ram Resident of Village- Jamo Mathiya, PS- Jamo Bazar, District- Siwan
2.
Kumariya Devi W/o Late Chhabila Ram Resident of Village- Jamo Mathiya, PS- Jamo Bazar, District- Siwan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Yashraj Bardhan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 103(1), 352, 351 and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his family members were not allowing his wife to work, hence he complained to his mother (petitioner no. 2) who said that you are under the influence of your wife and in-laws, further on 01.05.2026, four named accused persons including the petitioners had dispute with regard to panchayati, hence Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53719 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026
accused persons started assaulting him, when his wife came to save him, his younger brother (Amit) dashed on a cycle and all four named accused assaulted his wife by lathi, danda and fist, causing injury, further his sister-in-law (bhabhi) took both of them out of the house with a view to save them, thereafter accused persons did not allow them to enter the house.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner no. 2 is mother of the informant and informant is having dispute relating to property, as such, he has instituted the instant case with an intent to coerce the entire family members into submissions by implicating his mother and bhabhi in the case also.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53719 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026
connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 129 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
7. Accordingly the application stands allowed.
rajesh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T