Patna High Court
MJC/2895/2025 of Tulika Mridu @ Binny Vs Rahul Kumar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2895 of 2025 ====================================================== Tulika Mridu @ Binny W/o Rahul Kumar D/o Binay Kumar Mouar, Resident of 201, Sai Usha Residency, Krishnamurthy Marg, Infront of Kidzee School, Rani Bagaan, P.O. and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2895 of 2025
======================================================
Tulika Mridu @ Binny W/o Rahul Kumar D/o Binay Kumar Mouar, Resident of 201, Sai Usha Residency, Krishnamurthy Marg, Infront of Kidzee School, Rani Bagaan, P.O. and P.S. - Bariatu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand, Pin Code-
834009. Mobile No.- 7004104030.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Rahul Kumar S/o Ajay Kumar Singh, r/o village Sabalpur, P.S. Rajgir, Distt. - Nalanda, at present Shiv Nagar Post Mortem Road, Nawada, infront of Shiv Mandir, Nawada, P.S. and Distt.- Nawada. Mobile no.- 9035845711.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ram Naresh Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred: “for the transfer of Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 116 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nawada, Bihar to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court Patna, Bihar.”
3. The lady has shown her inability to attend the proceedings at the present place and reasons also assigned.
4. Learned counsel representing the opposite party also says that he has difficulty and there is apprehension in appearing before the transferred place but if he is allowed to appear through the video conferencing, has no objection.
Patna High Court MJC No.2895 of 2025(4) dt.17-08-2026
5. The petitioner has no objection to the husband appearing through video conferencing.
6. In that background, with the consent of both the parties, Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 116 of 2025 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nawada to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing.
7. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.
8. The MJC No. 2895 of 2025 stands disposed of.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U