Patna High Court
CWJC/12277/2026 of Md. Mustaque Vs The State of Bihar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12277 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. Md. Mustaque S/o Late Hazi Nabab, resident of Darbari Lane, P.S.-Danapur, District-Patna, at Present R/o S-18/182 Raja Bazar Varanasi Cant, District- Varanasi,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12277 of 2026
======================================================
1.
Md. Mustaque S/o Late Hazi Nabab, resident of Darbari Lane, P.S.-Danapur, District-Patna, at Present R/o S-18/182 Raja Bazar Varanasi Cant, District- Varanasi, (Uttar Pradesh) 221002.
2.
Md. Gyas, S/o Late Md. Nabab, resident of Darbari Lane, PS Danapur, District Patna at present R/o S-18/179-A1, Raja Bazar, Varanasi Cant.
District Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh) 221002.
3.
SM Gulab, S/o Late Md. Nabab, resident of Darbari Lane, P.S.-Danapur, District-Patna at Present R/o Station Line Dalsighpara, Tea Garden, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal-735208, Mobile No. 7001012083
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reform, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Patna.
4.
The Additional Collector, Patna.
5.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Patna.
6.
The Anchal Adhikari, Danapur, patna.
7.
Md. Reyaz, S/o Late Md. Nabab, resident of Darbari Lane, P.S.-Danapur,
8.
Md. Ayaz, S/o Md. Reyaz, resident of Darbari Lane, P.S.-Danapur, District- Patna.
9.
Md. Fayaz, S/o Md. Reyaz, resident of Darbari Lane, P.S.-Danapur, District- Patna.
10.
Md. Sohrab, S/o Late Md. Nabab, House No. 205, Dut and Chadda Enclave, Opp. G.S. College South Civil Line, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh-482001.
11.
Manoj Kumar, S/o Rajdeo Singh, resident of Udantola, P.S.-Shahpur,
District-Patna.
12.
Sanjay Kumar, S/o Chandradeep Ray, resident of Jalalpur, P.S.-Rupaspur,
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ankita Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Standing Counsel (18)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CWJC No.12277 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “(i) for issuance of writ in the nature of "Certiorari" application for disposal dated of an 20.04.2026 of Mutation (Annexure-P4) which was given to the Circle Officer, Danapur, Patna belongs to share of these five brother (petitioner) here and after mutation provide possession after due measurement from Respondent No. 11 and 12 who have illegally construct a boundary wall over the said plot, sold by the Respondent No. 7 and identified by Md. Fayaz and Md. Ayaz both S/o Md. Reyaz.
(ii) for
issuance
of
such direction/directions to the Respondents and any other relief/reliefs which the petitioners may be entitled on the basis of such directions.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that it will suffice if the respondent no. 6, the Circle Officer, Danapur decide the matter which he has kept pending for long.
4. Learned counsel representing the other side submits that it will be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest.
Patna High Court CWJC No.12277 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026
5. This Court has repeatedly seen that the Successive Revenue Authority sit over the matter for long without deciding it. In this particular case, four weeks’ time is granted to the Circle Officer, Danapur to decide the case of the petitioner failing which, he is expected to get an adverse order.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U