Patna High Court

CR. MISC./37709/2026 of Anil Mandal Vs The State of Bihar on 17 August 2026

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37709 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2026 Thana- TATARPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1. Anil Mandal S/O Late Arun Mandal R/O Village- Rekabganj, Police Station- Tatarpur, District-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37709 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2026 Thana- TATARPUR District- Bhagalpur

======================================================

1.

Anil Mandal S/O Late Arun Mandal R/O Village- Rekabganj, Police Station- Tatarpur, District- Bhagalpur.

2.

Sushil Mandal S/O Late Arun Mandal R/O Village- Rekabganj, Police Station- Tatarpur, District- Bhagalpur.

3.

Anish Mandal @ Anish Kumar S/O Anil Mandal R/O Village- Rekabganj, Police Station- Tatarpur, District- Bhagalpur.

4.

Ankur Mandal @ Ankul Kumar S/O Anil Mandal R/O Village- Rekabganj, Police Station- Tatarpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Nityanand Neeraj

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

ORAL ORDER

Page 1 of 3

17-08-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this bail application, so far as petitioner no. 4 (Ankur Mandal @ Ankul Kumar) is concerned.

2. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed as withdrawn in respect of petitioner no. 4.

3. The petitioners (i.e. petitioner nos. 1 to 3) apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2) of the B.N.S.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37709 of 2026(4) dt.17-08-2026

Page 2 of 3

both parties are Gotiyas and on account of land dispute, a free fight took place, in which, both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Rest of the allegations are super addition. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. In the facts & circumstances of the case, let the petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 3, as named above, in the event of arrest / surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Addl. Sessions Judge – XVI, Bhagalpur in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S.

7. This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead