Patna High Court
CR. MISC./56928/2026 of Aaditya Kumar Prasad @ Aadeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56928 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2026 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Aaditya Kumar Prasad @ Aadeep Kumar Son of Paras Prasad Resident of Village- Phokhar Bhinda,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56928 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2026 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ======================================================
Aaditya Kumar Prasad @ Aadeep Kumar Son of Paras Prasad Resident of Village- Phokhar Bhinda, Mahuwa Tola, Sasamusa, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3
17-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 29.03.2026 at about 3 PM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, abused the wife of informant and when informant objected, the accused persons assaulted informant with lathi, danda, iron rod.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Both parties are pattidars and on account of land dispute, a free fight took place between them in which both sides sustained injuries.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56928 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026
Page 2 of 3
Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of specific overt act against petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering backdrop of the case, nature of accusation, case and counter case and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Kuchaikote P. S. Case No. 155 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…