Patna High Court
MJC/2153/2025 of Swati Kumari @ Swati Singh Vs Vivek Kumar on 17 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2153 of 2025 ====================================================== Swati Kumari @ Swati Singh Wife of Vivek Kumar, Daughter of Rampravesh Singh, Resident of Village-Basdila, P.O.-Basdila, Police Station-Jalalpur, District-Saran,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2153 of 2025
======================================================
Swati Kumari @ Swati Singh Wife of Vivek Kumar, Daughter of Rampravesh Singh, Resident of Village-Basdila, P.O.-Basdila, Police Station-Jalalpur, District-Saran, presently residing at Village and P.O.-Singhiya, Police Station- Singhiya, District-Samastipur (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Vivek Kumar son of Chandra Shekhar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Basdila, P.O.-Basdila, Police Station-Jalalpur, District-Saran, Pin Code- 841412 (Bihar).
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-08-2026 Heard the parties through virtual mode.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): "for transfer of Matrimonial Divorce Case No. 107 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chapra (Saran) to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur.”
3. The lady has shown her inability to attend the proceedings at the present place and reasons also assigned.
4. The opposite party on the other hand submits that he has no objection to the relief sought for by the petitioner but he be allowed to appear through the video conferencing.
Patna High Court MJC No.2153 of 2025(4) dt.17-08-2026
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the opposite party appear through the video conferencing.
6. Having heard with the consent of both parties, Matrimonial Divorce Case No. 107 of 2025 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chapra (Saran) to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur, with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing.
7. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation.
8. The MJC No. 2153 of 2025 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.
sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U