Patna High Court
CR. MISC./83998/2023 of PRAMOD KUMAR Vs The State of Bihar on 14 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83998 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1023 Year-2023 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== 1. Pramod Kumar Son Of Deep Narayan Yadav R/O Railway Langra Bagan, Railway
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83998 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1023 Year-2023 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE
District- Katihar
======================================================
1.
Pramod Kumar Son Of Deep Narayan Yadav R/O Railway Langra Bagan, Railway Quarter No. 794/B, P.S.- Sahayak, Dist.- Katihar
2.
Preeti Pallavi @ Priti Pallavi D/O Gaurandra Kumar, W/O Pramod Kumar R/O Railway Langra Bagan, Railway Quarter No. 794/B, P.S.- Sahayak, Dist.- Katihar
3.
Aman Kumar Son Of Late Ram Swarath Yadav R/O Railway Quarter No.
788/D, New Colony, Near Adarsh High School, P.S.- Sahayak, Dist.- Katihar
4.
Anupriya Kumari D/O Mahendra Prasad, W/O Aman Kumar R/O Railway Quarter No. 788/D, New Colony, Near Adarsh High School, P.S.- Sahayak, Dist.- Katihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Sanjay Kumar Singh Son Of Late Satya Narayan Singh R/O Railway Quarter No. 1040/D, Emergency Colony, P.S.- Sahayak, Dist.- Katihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Bhola Prasad
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
3 14-08-2026 Mr. Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present application as the parties have entered into out of a court settlement and the stay in the present proceedings is coming in way of giving effect to the said settlement.
2. In such view of the matter, the present application is disposed of as withdrawn.
devendra/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T