Patna High Court
CR. MISC./44635/2026 of Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 14 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44635 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2022 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Amit Kumar, aged about 22 years, Male, S/O Ramesh Paswan @ Ramesh Ram, Resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44635 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2022 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran ======================================================
Amit Kumar, aged about 22 years, Male, S/O Ramesh Paswan @ Ramesh Ram, Resident of Village- Bakhariya, PS- Majhauliya, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
MALVIYA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
3 14-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected by this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50572 of 2024 and petitioner was arrested with the looted bank amount of Rs.13,20770/-, so there is no fresh ground to reconsider the prayer for bail of this petitioner.
4. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby again rejected.
5. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
Brajesh Kumar/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T