CR. MISC./24699/2026 of Nande Sahni @ Ramnandan Sahni Vs The State of Bihar on 14 August 2026

ORAL ORDER

14-08-2026 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Bela Singh, learned counsel representing the informant beside learned APP representing the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 726 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, lodged on 05.12.2026 by the informant, Chandramuni Devi.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that armed variously, the petitioners entered home and firstly Shubhash hit with the butt of revolver on her eyes and thereafter the others resorted to assault the family members which include Sunny, Sanjit and Manish. This led to the F.I.R.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that there is case and counter case, both sides have suffered, their case is earlier to the present one which was lodged a day later. Further, most of the injuries have been found to be simple in nature, only injury of Sanjit has been found to be grievous in nature. There is omnibus allegation against all of them.

5. Mrs. Bela Singh, learned counsel for the informant on the other hand opposes the prayer submitting that the subsequent investigation shows that Mukesh and Rakesh assaulted Sanjit and the injuries have been found to be grievous in nature. Further, she made an objection before the coordinate Bench on 17.07.2026 that despite the petitioner no.6 having two criminal antecedents and he is on bail in which subsequently, the Court has also canceled the bail, the said fact was not disclosed in paragraph no.3 of the petition.

6. On the order of the coordinate Bench, a supplementary affidavit has come and the statement made by Mrs. Bela Singh has been found to be correct.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts as also the allegation that has come against the petitioner no.2, Rakesh Kumar Sahni, petitioner no.4, Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sahni and the suppression of the fact by petitioner no.6, Ashok Sahni, their anticipatory bail application stand rejected.

8. So far as the petitioner nos. 1, 3, 5 and 7 namely Nande Sahni @ Ramnandan Sahni, Vivek Kumar, Subhash Kumar Sahni and Anand Kumar respectively are concerned, considering that most of them have no criminal antecedent, there is case and counter case, the injuries inflicted by them have been found to be simple in nature, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail.

9. Let the petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 726 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:-

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioners who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to show his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioners shall be appearing before the Police

Station as and when required for cooperating in the investigation;

(iii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iv) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next six months to mark his attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;

(v) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(vi) the petitioners shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds.

vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T