Patna High Court

CR. MISC./61465/2018 of Md. Islamudin @ Md. Islamuddin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61465 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2018 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran ====================================================== Md. Islamudin @ Md. Islamuddin Son of Late Imamudin, Resident of Village- Shahpur Dor Chhapra, P.S.-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61465 of 2018

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2018 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran

======================================================

Md. Islamudin @ Md. Islamuddin Son of Late Imamudin, Resident of Village- Shahpur Dor Chhapra, P.S.- Amnour, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar

2.

Shabina Khatoon, Wife of Md. Jainuddin @ Md. Jamaluddin, at present residing at Village- Khaira, P.S.- Khaira, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, A.P.P.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. By order dated 17.03.2026, the status report of the case was called for from the Court below. The status report has been submitted vide Letter No. 1067 of 2026 dated 26.03.2026. From the said report, it appears that charges against the petitioner were framed on 26.03.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/34, 312/34, 313/34 and 315/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Pursuant to the framing of charge, a total of eight prosecution witnesses have been examined. The prosecution evidence has been closed and the case has been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61465 of 2018(8) dt.13-08-2026

fixed for recording the statement of the accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. Considering the advanced stage of the trial, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed.

Neha/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead