Patna High Court
CR. WJC/516/2026 of Dr. Priyesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Dept. of Home, Bihar, Patna on 13 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.516 of 2026 Arising out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2025 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== Dr. Priyesh Kumar, Son of Hari Shankar Prasad, Resident of Vill -Baligoan PS- Baligoan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.516 of 2026
Arising out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2025 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya
======================================================
Dr. Priyesh Kumar, Son of Hari Shankar Prasad, Resident of Vill -Baligoan PS- Baligoan Dist -Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Dept. of Home, Bihar, Patna Bihar
2.
The Home Secretary, Bihar, Patna, (Dept. of Home) bihar
3.
The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna bihar
4.
The Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Bihar, Patna bihar
5.
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya Jee bihar
6.
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Khizarsarai bihar
7.
The officer in charge of Khizarsarai, Ps- Khizarsarai bihar
8.
The Investigating Officer of Khizarsarai Ps case No. 407 of 2025, Gaya jee bihar
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Priya Ranjan, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
None
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
13-08-2026 As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the cause title of the writ petition regarding range in the designation of respondent No. 4.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of State-respondents.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press any relief(s) except Prayer No. (iii) which is for "registration of a fresh FIR against Dr.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.516 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026
Prabhat Kumar Singh (Informant), Ravi Bhushan Kumar, Bhim Sharma and Rishi Kumar."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has given a written report to the SHO of Khizarsarai Police Station, District-Gaya on 08.01.2026 and another application in the Office of the Inspector General, Magadh Range on 08.01.2026 but neither FIR has been instituted nor investigation was made. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the authorities may be directed to act upon the application given in the Office of the Inspector General, Magadh Range on 08.01.2026.
5. In the light of submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the respondent No. 4, the Inspector General of Police, Magadh Range is directed to act upon the application given his Office in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions/observations.
Vikash/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T