Patna High Court
MA/367/2026 of Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd Vs Nirmala Devi on 13 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.367 of 2026 ====================================================== Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd Through its Authorised Signatory Utsav Kumar, Executive Trainee Claims Legal, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd, 6th
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.367 of 2026
======================================================
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd Through its Authorised Signatory Utsav Kumar, Executive Trainee Claims Legal, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd, 6th Floor, Alankar Place, Boring Road Crossing, Patna-800001
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
Nirmala Devi W/O Mithilesh Singh R/O Village- Tetaria, P.S. Khizarsarai, District- Gaya (Bihar)
2.
Mithilesh Singh, S/O Late Bittu Kumar Singh @ Bittu Kumar R/O Village- Tetaria, P.S. Khizarsarai, District- Gaya (Bihar)
3.
Mr. Rinku Kumar Keshri, S/O Late Sitram Saw, R/O Upthu, P.S.
Khizarsarai, District- Gaya (owner of the Tempo bearing Registration Number BR02GA6661)
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Ms. Mayuri, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
13-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 1912.2025 passed by the Court of Bihar Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Magadh Division, Gaya in MACT Case No. 117 of 2025/MAC Case No. 232/19, the appellant above named begs to file this memorandum of appeal.”
3. Learned counsel for the appellant, Ms. Mayuri Patna High Court MA No.367 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026
submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and as such, she may be permitted to withdraw it.
4. Permission accorded.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
6. The statutory amount, if any, should be returned to the appellant.
ankita/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U