Patna High Court
CWJC/12111/2026 of Raj Kishore Jha Vs The State of Bihar on 13 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12111 of 2026 ====================================================== Raj Kishore Jha Son of Late Vankhandhi Jha, resident of village- Sahsol, P.S.- Bashnahi, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12111 of 2026
======================================================
Raj Kishore Jha Son of Late Vankhandhi Jha, resident of village- Sahsol, P.S.- Bashnahi, District- Saharsa
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Dairy, Fishery and Animal Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna
2.
The Director, Department of Fishery Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna
3.
The Deputy Director, Department of Fishery Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna
4.
The Secretary, Department of Fishery Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna
5.
The Deputy Secretary, Department of Dairy, Fishery and Animal Resources (Fishery), Government of Bihar, Patna
6.
The Joint Director, Department of Fishery Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna
7.
The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Dileep Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GP 04
For the AG
:
Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Vijeta Kumari, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 13-08-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned Advocate for the State as well as learned Advocate for the Accountant General.
2. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court seeking issuance of the writ in nature of mandamus directing upon the respondents to pay the salary of the petitioner of 9th pay level since 29.11.2023 till the date of his Patna High Court CWJC No.12111 of 2026 dt.13-08-2026
superannuation and further all the benefits in compliance of notification of General Administration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna in Notification No. 19300 dated 13.10.2023.
3. Briefly stated that while the petitioner was discharging his duty as Fishery Extension Supervisor, on being found him eligible, the Directorate, Fishery New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road issued a Letter bearing No. 2413 dated 29.11.2023 whereby and whereunder the petitioner and others have been promoted to the post of Fishery Extension Officer. In the meanwhile, the Government of Bihar has also come out with a Notification No. 19300 dated 13.10.2023 in the matter of promotion to the next higher level. Further the name of the petitioner also stands at No. 8 in the screening committee report, but he has been denied the benefits as claimed for.
4. It is thus submitted that despite the petitioner being entitled to get 9th pay level, the same has not been accorded. Nonetheless; others, even junior to the petitioner, have been allowed the similar pay scale. However, there is no whisper with respect to particulars of those persons who have been allowed the 9th pay scale despite being junior to the petitioner.
5. Learned Advocate for the State refuting the Patna High Court CWJC No.12111 of 2026 dt.13-08-2026
contention submitted that for the purpose of 9th pay scale, the petitioner ought to acquire eligibility and working experience of five years and prima facie it appears that the same has not been completed by the petitioner; since the petitioner has superannuated on 31.01.2025 itself.
6. Considering the fact that all the essential materials have not been brought on record as to who are the persons, junior to the petitioner has been extended the benefit of such 9th pay level, this Court deems it fit and proper to dispose off the writ petition with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation bringing on record all the necessary facts, before the respondent no. 4, Secretary, Department of Fishery Resources, Govt. of Bihar, preferably within a period of four weeks, from today.
7. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed off by a reason and speaking order, within the stipulated period.
8. The writ petition stands disposed off.
siddharth/- (Harish Kumar, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.08.2026 Transmission Date NA