Patna High Court

CWJC/15699/2023 of Mahatma Vyasanand Vs The Union of India on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15699 of 2023 ====================================================== Mahatma Vyasanand Son of Swami Satyanand Ji, Resident of Brahma Vidyalaya and Aashram, Chhotka Rajpur, P.S.- Simri, District- Buxar, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15699 of 2023

======================================================

Mahatma Vyasanand Son of Swami Satyanand Ji, Resident of Brahma Vidyalaya and Aashram, Chhotka Rajpur, P.S.- Simri, District- Buxar, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, New Delhi.

2.

The Chief Executive Officer, Unique Identification of India, Bangla Sahib Road, Behind Kali Mandir, Gole Market, New Delhi- 110001.

3.

The Deputy Director, UIDAI Regional Office, Ranchi, 1st Floor, JIADA

Central Office Building, Namkum Industrial Area Near STPI Lowadih, Ranchi 834010.

4.

The Director, UIDAI Camp Office, 4th floor, Lalit Bhavan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna - 800001.

5.

Sadhvi Sarojanand, Daughter of Not Known, C/o- Swami Vedvyasanand, Resident of 63, Brahma Vidyalaya And Aashram, Chhotka Rajpur, P.S.- Simari, District- Buxar, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, CGC

: Mr. Radhika Raman, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

13-08-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for a direction to the concerned respondent authorities to cancel the Aadhar Card of the Respondent No. 5 Sadhwi Sarojanand bearing Aadhar No. 485635898037 in the facts and

Patna High Court CWJC No.15699 of 2023(10) dt.13-08-2026

circumstances of the case.

(ii) for a direction to the concerned respondent authorities to institute the appropriate legal proceeding including institution of FIR against the Respondent No.5 for bringing into existence the Aadhar No. 485635898037 on a wrong address where she has never resided and the same has been procured on the basis of wrong information provided by her.

(iii) for any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner may be found entitled.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sumit Kumar prays for withdrawal of the petition.

4. Permission accorded.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

ankita/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead