Patna High Court
CR. MISC./51724/2026 of Kiran Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 13 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51724 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2018 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== Kiran Devi W/O Jai Kishore Ram R/O Village and Post- Pokhaira, P.S-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51724 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2018 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE
District- Samastipur
======================================================
Kiran Devi W/O Jai Kishore Ram R/O Village and Post- Pokhaira, P.S- Samastipur (Muffasil), District- Samastipur (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Pinki Kumari D/O Satrughan Ram R/O Village- Pokhraira, Ward No.6, P.S.- Samastipur (Muffasil), Distt.- Samastipur.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Satish Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jai Narain Thakur
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
13-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that her mother was elected as Panch, hence, her neighbourer, Bulla and Prem started taunting, accordingly, a Panchayati was convened and the issue remained pacified for some times, but Bulla and Prem again started Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51724 of 2026(3) dt.13-08-2026
passing obscene remarks and acted inappropriately when she went for coaching, further on 23.05.2018 while she was coming back from the coaching, Prem and Bulla stopped her cycle and started abusing, on objection, they threw her copy and books, thereafter she came back home and disclosed about the occurrence to her mother, accordingly her mother took her to their house where Indra and Kiran (petitioner) were present, further when occurrence was disclosed, they became angry and started abusing, on objection, they pushed her mother causing injury on waist, hence they came back, further her father came at 07:00 PM when Bulla and Prem along with named accused persons excluding Indra and petitioner came in an intoxicated condition and Prem along with Bulla dashed her on the bed and Bulla started rubbing her chest, further named accused persons caught her mother’s hand and Mohan puller her saree while Umesh started kissing her and Jaikishun snatched her chain, on alarm people gathered and accused fled after snatching Rs. 2,000/-
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being mother of Bulla. It is further submitted that thrust of allegation is against Prem and Bulla. It is also Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51724 of 2026(3) dt.13-08-2026
submitted that petitioner has been implicated only with an intent to coerce Prem and Bulla into submission.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a woman, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with C.R. Case No. 69 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.
Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T