Patna High Court
MJC/575/2025 of Sukhdeo Mandal Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education on 13 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.575 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4563 of 2013 ====================================================== 1. Sukhdeo Mandal Son of Late Ramji Mandal, resident of village- Magrouni, Ward No. 04, P.S. - Mahishi, District-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.575 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4563 of 2013
======================================================
1.
Sukhdeo Mandal Son of Late Ramji Mandal, resident of village- Magrouni, Ward No. 04, P.S. - Mahishi, District- Saharsa.
2.
Upendra Prasad Yadav, Son of Late Chanchal Yadav, resident of village - Mahpura, P.S. - Mahishi, District - Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Baidyanath Yadav.
2.
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely, Sri Pankaj Kumar.
3.
The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa, namely, Sri Anil Kumar.
4.
The District Education Officer, Saharsa, namely Sri Anil Kumar.
5.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saharsa, namely Sri Sanjay Kumar.
6.
The District Treasury Officer, Saharsa, namely, Sri Murad Ali.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, A.A.G.-13
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
13-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 08.05.2014 passed in C. W. J. C.
Patna High Court MJC No.575 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2026
No. 4563 of 2013 ."
3. The show cause records that the claim stands rejected.
4. In that background, granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if he so wants, MJC. No. 575 of 2025 is disposed of.
ankita/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U