Patna High Court
CR. MISC./52132/2026 of Dhiraj Kumar @ Dheeraj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 13 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52132 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2026 Thana- KARPURIGRAM District- Samastipur ====================================================== Dhiraj Kumar @ Dheeraj Yadav Son of Jivachh Rai @ Jeevachh Ray R/O Vill.- Dorapar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52132 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2026 Thana- KARPURIGRAM District- Samastipur ======================================================
Dhiraj Kumar @ Dheeraj Yadav Son of Jivachh Rai @ Jeevachh Ray R/O
Vill.- Dorapar Chandauli, P.S.- Waini, District - Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
13-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 132, 109, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The learned APP for the State, at the outset, submits that petitioner has antecedent of 14 cases and informant alleges that petitioner fired at the police.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not dispute the said submission of the learned APP that the aforesaid allegation is alleged, but then submits that no one was injured in the firing, on which the learned APP submits that informant is a police office and he alleges that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52132 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026
while they were returning back to the police station when petitioner and other accused intercepted the force by a Scorpio vehicle and petitioner fired and petitioner is a criminal.
5. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
6. Permission is accorded.
7. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T