Patna High Court

MJC/653/2026 of Ratna Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Gopalganj, on 7 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.653 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12773 of 2023 ====================================================== Ratna Kumari, Gender – Female, W/o Praveen Upadhayay @ Praveen Kumar Upadhayay, Resident of Village - Bhathwa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.653 of 2026

In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12773 of 2023

======================================================

Ratna Kumari, Gender – Female, W/o Praveen Upadhayay @ Praveen Kumar Upadhayay, Resident of Village - Bhathwa Pasuram, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj namely Pawan Kumar Sinha, at present District Magistrate, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

2.

Shri Nawal Kishore Chaudhary, S/o not known, the then District Magistrate, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

3.

Anil Kumar, Sub-Divisional Officer, Gopalganj.

4.

Vikesh Kumar, the Circle Officer, Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj.

5.

Sumit Kumar, the B.D.O, Hathua, District- Gopalganj.

6.

Ajay Prakash Rai, the B.D.O, Thawe, District- Gopalganj.

7.

Sanjiv Kumar Singh, the B.D.O, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

8.

Janardhan Tripathi, the Registrar, District Consumer Forum, Gopalganj.

9.

Sashisekharam, the District Transport Officer, Gopalganj.

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Vishwajeet Kr. Mishra, Advocate

Mr. Prawal Mani Tripathi, Advocate

Mr. Kishlay Kumar, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Standing Counsel 22

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

07-08-2026 At the outset, the learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted that to be fair to this Court the opposite parties have not acted strictly in consonance with the order dated 18.12.2023 passed by this Court in CWJC No. 12773 of 2023, however in view of the pendency of the aforesaid writ Patna High Court MJC No.653 of 2026(3) dt.07-08-2026

petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be granted liberty to raise this issue in the pending writ petition itself, however liberty be granted to mention the said writ petition before the appropriate Bench for early hearing. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

2. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

GAURAV S./- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead