Patna High Court

CWJC/11562/2026 of Dr. Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 7 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11562 of 2026 ====================================================== Dr. Vijay Kumar Son of Lalan Kumar, permanent resident of Ward No.45, Bada Bariyarpur, Police Station- Chhatauni, District- East Champaran (Motihari). At present

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11562 of 2026

======================================================

Dr. Vijay Kumar Son of Lalan Kumar, permanent resident of Ward No.45, Bada Bariyarpur, Police Station- Chhatauni, District- East Champaran (Motihari). At present posted as Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Jagdam College, Police Station- Chapra Town, District- Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Jai Prakash University through its Registrar, Chapra.

4.

The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University Chapra.

5.

The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

6.

The Financial Advisor, Jai Prakash University Chapra.

7.

The Finance Officer, Jai Prakash University Chapra.

8.

The Additional Chief Secretary to the Chancellor, Universities of Bihar, Patna.

9.

The District Magistrate, Chapra.

10.

The Principal, Jagdam College, Chapra.

... ... Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Gyan Prakash, Adv.

Ms. Parul Priya, Adv.

For the State

:

Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Adv.

For the J.P.U.

:

Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-3

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

07-08-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The initial challenge in the present writ petition was directed against Letter No. 5344-Est-I dated 27.05.2026 and the consequential amended Letter No. 5406-Est-I dated 06.06.2026 issued under the signature of the Vice-Chancellor, Jai Prakash Patna High Court CWJC No.11562 of 2026(2) dt.07-08-2026

University, Chapra, whereby, so far as the petitioner is concerned, he was deputed as Bursar in a newly created Government Degree College until further order.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, however, fairly submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the University reconsidered the matter and issued a fresh consequential Notification dated 01.07.2026, whereby the earlier decision, insofar as it related to the petitioner, stood superseded/rendered redundant and, in his place, Dr. Md. Ashdullah, Assistant Professor, was deputed as Bursar in the newly created Government Degree College. It is further submitted that the University appears to have realized that the earlier exercise had been undertaken without inviting options from the eligible Assistant Professors/Professors, and accordingly the said error was rectified by issuance of the aforesaid Notification dated 01.07.2026.

4. Learned Advocactes appearing on behalf of the State as well as the University fairly accepts the aforesaid factual position and places before this Court the Notification dated 01.07.2026, a copy whereof is taken on record.

5. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking note of the subsequent Patna High Court CWJC No.11562 of 2026(2) dt.07-08-2026

Notification dated 01.07.2026, this Court finds that the impugned Letter No. 5344-Est-I dated 27.05.2026 and the consequential Letter No. 5406-Est-I dated 06.06.2026, insofar as they relate to the petitioner, no longer survive for consideration, having been effectively superseded by the subsequent Notification. Consequently, the grievance raised by the petitioner stands redressed.

6. In view of the above, no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

rohit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead