Patna High Court
CR. MISC./39527/2026 of Sunil Rai @ Sunil Ray Vs The state of Bihar on 7 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39527 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2023 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== Sunil Rai @ Sunil Ray S/o Shiv Nath Rai @ Shivnath Ray R/o Vill- Badhichak, P.S -Maker ,District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39527 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2023 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ======================================================
Sunil Rai @ Sunil Ray S/o Shiv Nath Rai @ Shivnath Ray R/o Vill- Badhichak, P.S -Maker ,District -Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The state of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Ms. Chetna, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
07-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 01.04.2026 and the informant alleges that Manoj assaulted him by kudal causing injury on head and when his brother Lal Babu Rai came to save him, he was assaulted by the petitioner by kudal indiscriminately causing three injuries on head.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of dispute relating to land, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39527 of 2026(2) dt.07-08-2026
submitted that though informant alleges that his brother was assaulted indiscriminately by the petitioner on head by kudal causing three injuries but then from perusal of the injury report annexed as Annexure-P/3 series to the regular bail application, it would manifest that Lal Babu Rai suffered only one injury on his head but then the injury has been opined to be grievous in nature but the blow was not repeated and petitioner is not a criminal. It is also submitted that if privilege of regular bail is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Maker P.S. Case No.99 of 2023.
7. It is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the framing of charge or after framing of charge is trying to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39527 of 2026(2) dt.07-08-2026
delay the trial, in both the conditions, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T