Patna High Court
CR. MISC./31085/2026 of Nandan Ram Vs The State of Bihar on 7 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31085 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-506 Year-2024 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Nandan Ram S/o Tulshi Ram Resident of Village - Kritpur English, Ward No. 9, Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31085 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-506 Year-2024 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ======================================================
Nandan Ram S/o Tulshi Ram Resident of Village - Kritpur English, Ward No.
9, Police Station - Harsidhi, District - East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
XXXX S/o YYY R/o Village and P.O. - Chadarahiya Ward no. 10, P.S. - Harsidhi, Dis. - East Champaran.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Advocate
For the State
:
Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
07-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Despite valid service of notice, no one appears on behalf of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2.
3. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 87 and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.
4. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner, along with other F.I.R. named accused persons, kidnapped minor daughter of informant.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31085 of 2026(5) dt.07-08-2026
petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. During investigation, the victim was recovered and her statement was recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. wherein she denied the factum of kidnapping and categorically stated that she was in love with this petitioner and out of her own volition, she left her house and solemnized marriage with this petitioner. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since 13.01.2026.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
7. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., period of custody and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is allowed.
8. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th District and Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO Act, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31085 of 2026(5) dt.07-08-2026
506 of 2024.
shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T