Patna High Court
CR. MISC./30622/2026 of Raman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 7 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30622 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2024 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Raman Kumar S/o Late Kailash Rai @ Kailash Ray Resident of Village- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Sonbarsa,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30622 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2024 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ======================================================
Raman Kumar S/o Late Kailash Rai @ Kailash Ray Resident of Village- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi,
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner
:
Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
07-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. Earlier, the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner was rejected on merit vide order dated 11.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17882 of 2025.
4. Vide order dated 14.05.2026, a report regarding the current stage of trial was called for and accordingly, the same has been received. From perusal of the report, it is apparent that out of five prosecution witnesses, three witnesses have already been examined and summons have been issued against the two witnesses who are yet to be examined.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30622 of 2026(3) dt.07-08-2026
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and advanced stage of trial, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is rejected.
6. However, considering the fact that petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2025, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T