Patna High Court
CWJC/11850/2026 of Umesh Chandra Bhaskar Vs The State of Bihar on 7 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11850 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. Umesh Chandra Bhaskar son of Late Hemraj Mahto, Resident of Village Hathiyar, P.S.-Mofassil at present Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya Jee. 2. Rajesh Kumar Singh son of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11850 of 2026
======================================================
1.
Umesh Chandra Bhaskar son of Late Hemraj Mahto, Resident of Village Hathiyar, P.S.-Mofassil at present Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya Jee.
2.
Rajesh Kumar Singh son of Late Sarju Ram, Resident of village- Badki Baghni, P.S. Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya Jee.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gaya Jee.
2.
That District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gaya Jee.
3.
The Additional Collector, Gaya Jee.
4.
The Superintendent of Police, Gaya Jee.
5.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya Jee.
6.
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sadar, Gaya Jee.
7.
The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bodh Gaya, Gaya Jee.
8.
The Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya Jee.
9.
The Circle Inspector, Bodh Gaya Block, District- Gaya Jee.
10.
The Station House Officer, Bodh Gaya Police Station, District-Gaya Jee.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Niranjan Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-03
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
07-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing and commanding the responsible. respondent authorities specially Respondent No. 8 i.e. Circle
Officer, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya Jee to consider and mutate the land of the Petitioners in their names and fix the rent by creating the Jamabandi in favour of them, appertaining to total area (6 Acre 45 + 5 acre 25 dismil) = 11 Acre 70 dismil having Old Khata No. 165 (New Khata No. 590), Old Plot No. 45, 50 and 53, (New Plot No. 119, 126 and 123), Thana No. 355, Mauza- Amwan, Police Station Bodh Gaya, under the District of Gaya Jee (Bihar) in the name of the Petitioners respectively as the petitioners are having absolute title / ownership and peaceful possession over the above mentioned properties, upon which, they have got absolute right, title and interest over the aforesaid piece of land vide judgement and decree dated 18.03.2021 and 27.03.2021 respectively passed by the Learned Sub Judge-III, Gaya in Title Suit No. 49/2021/797/2015 015 (Umesh Chandra Bhaskar Versus Trustee Shivalaya Newtapur
Sewait Ramesh Giri and others).
(ii) for issuance of any other order or orders for which Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. The matter relates to khata no. 165, plot nos. 45, 50 and 53, mauza- Amwan, P.S.-Both Gaya, district-Gayaji.
4. The contention is that this petitioner fought battle with Trustee Shivalaya Newtapur Sewait Ramesh Giri and others in Title Suit No. 49 of 2021. Later, they entered into a compromise which followed the stamped by the learned Sub- Judge-III, Gaya on 18.02.202. Submission is that thereafter, armed with the said order, the petitioner moved before the Circle Officer, Both Gaya but no final order has been passed.
5. Learned State counsel submits that proper petition probably has not been filed and only a representation is there.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to approach the concerned official in next four weeks alongwith a proper document/fees.
7. If such petition is preferred within four weeks, the Circle Officer, Both Gaya (respondent no.08) shall be putting all the stake holders on notice and afterafter shall pass an appropriate order at an earliest.
8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U