Patna High Court

CR. MISC./27579/2026 of Tinku Thakur @ Tinku Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 7 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27579 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Tinku Thakur @ Tinku Kumar S/O Umesh Thakur Resident of Village- Fanda, P.S- Paroo, Distt.-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27579 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ======================================================

Tinku Thakur @ Tinku Kumar S/O Umesh Thakur Resident of Village- Fanda, P.S- Paroo, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Manindra Kishore Singh, Adv.

Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP

Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv.for Informant

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

07-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence under Section 80 / 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The petitioner is husband of the deceased and it is alleged that all the accused persons including petitioner committed torture & cruelty with daughter of informant for dowry and ultimately killed her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, the deceased committed suicide by hanging. Learned counsel orally submits that after framing of charge, two witnesses have been examined on behalf of prosecution and both of them did not support the prosecution case. Petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2026, having no Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27579 of 2026(3) dt.07-08-2026

criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail- bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate (West), Muzaffarpur / concerned Court in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025.

anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead